JavaScript: The World's Most Misunderstood Programming Language Douglas Crockford(认为看不懂的请绕开)
2017-03-17 20:58
302 查看
JavaScript:
The World's Most Misunderstood Programming Language
Douglas Crockfordwww.crockford.com
JavaScript, aka Mocha, aka LiveScript, aka JScript, aka ECMAScript, is one of the world's most popular programming languages. Virtually every personal computer in the world has at least one JavaScript
interpreter installed on it and in active use. JavaScript's popularity is due entirely to its role as the scripting language of the WWW.
Despite its popularity, few know that JavaScript is a very nice dynamic object-oriented general-purpose programming language. How can this be a secret? Why is this language so misunderstood?
The Name
The Java- prefix suggests that JavaScript is somehow related to Java, that it is a subset or less capable version of Java. It seems that the name was intentionally selected to create confusion, and from confusion comes misunderstanding. JavaScriptis not interpreted Java. Java is interpreted Java. JavaScript is a different language.
JavaScript has a syntactic similarity to Java, much as Java has to C. But it is no more a subset of Java than Java is a subset of C. It is better than Java in the applications that Java (fka Oak) was originally intended for.
JavaScript was not developed at Sun Microsystems, the home of Java. JavaScript was developed at Netscape. It was originally called LiveScript, but that name wasn't confusing enough.
The -Script suffix suggests that it is not a real programming language, that a scripting language is less than a programming language. But it is really a matter of specialization. Compared to C, JavaScript trades performance for expressive power
and dynamism.
Lisp in C's Clothing
JavaScript's C-like syntax, including curly braces and the clunky for statement, makes it appear to be an ordinary procedural language. This is misleading because JavaScript has more in common with functional languages like Lispor Scheme than with C or Java. It has arrays instead of lists and objects instead of property lists. Functions are first class. It has closures. You get lambdas without having to balance all those parens.
Typecasting
JavaScript was designed to run in Netscape Navigator. Its success there led to it becoming standard equipment in virtually all web browsers. This has resulted in typecasting. JavaScript is the GeorgeReeves of programming languages. JavaScript is well suited to a large class of non-Web-related applications
Moving Target
The first versions of JavaScript were quite weak. They lacked exception handling, inner functions, and inheritance. In its present form, it is now a complete object-oriented programming language. But many opinions of the language are based on its immatureforms.
The ECMA committee that has stewardship over the language is developing extensions which, while well intentioned, will aggravate one of the language's biggest problems: There are already too many versions. This creates confusion.
Design Errors
No programming language is perfect. JavaScript has its share of design errors, such as the overloading of + to mean both addition and concatenation with type coercion, and the error-prone with statement should be avoided. The reserved wordpolicies are much too strict. Semicolon insertion was a huge mistake, as was the notation for literal regular expressions. These mistakes have led to programming errors, and called the design of the language as a whole into question. Fortunately, many of these
problems can be mitigated with a good lint program.
The design of the language on the whole is quite sound. Surprisingly, the ECMAScript committee does not appear to be interested in correcting these problems. Perhaps they are more interested in making new ones.
Lousy Implementations
Some of the earlier implementations of JavaScript were quite buggy. This reflected badly on the language. Compounding that, those implementations were embedded in horribly buggy web browsers.Bad Books
Nearly all of the books about JavaScript are quite awful. They contain errors, poor examples, and promote bad practices. Important features of the language are often explained poorly, or left out entirely. I have reviewed dozens of JavaScript books, and Ican only recommend one: JavaScript: The Definitive Guide (5th Edition) by David Flanagan. (Attention authors: If you have written
a good one, please send me a review copy.)
Substandard Standard
The official specification for the language is published by ECMA. The specificationis of extremely poor quality. It is difficult to read and very difficult to understand. This has been a contributor to the Bad Book problem because authors have been unable to use the standard document to improve their own understanding of the language. ECMA
and the TC39 committee should be deeply embarrassed.
Amateurs
Most of the people writing in JavaScript are not programmers. They lack the training and discipline to write good programs. JavaScript has so much expressive power that they are able to do useful things in it, anyway. This has given JavaScript a reputationof being strictly for the amateurs, that it is not suitable for professional programming. This is simply not the case.
Object-Oriented
Is JavaScript object-oriented? It has objects which can contain data and methods that act upon that data. Objects can contain other objects. It does not have classes, but it does have constructors which do what classes do, including acting as containersfor class variables and methods. It does not have class-oriented inheritance, but it does have prototype-oriented inheritance.
The two main ways of building up object systems are by inheritance (is-a) and by aggregation (has-a). JavaScript does both, but its dynamic nature allows it to excel at aggregation.
Some argue that JavaScript is not truly object oriented because it does not provide information hiding. That is, objects cannot have private variables and private methods: All members are public.
But it turns out that JavaScript objects can have private variables and private methods. (Click here now to find out how.) Of course, few understand this because JavaScript
is the world's most misunderstood programming language.
Some argue that JavaScript is not truly object oriented because it does not provide inheritance. But it turns out that JavaScript supports not only classical inheritance, but other
code reuse patterns as well.
Copyright 2001 Douglas Crockford. All Rights Reserved Wrrrldwide.
相关文章推荐
- [导入]JavaScript:The World's Most Misunderstood Programming Language
- JavaScript:The World's Most Misunderstood Programming Language
- JavaScript: The World's Most Misunderstood Programming Language
- Code Conventions for the JavaScript Programming Language
- Code Conventions for the JavaScript Programming Language
- C++: The Most Powerful Language for .NET Framework Programming
- 为什么JavaScript有能力成为未来企业级编程语言?Why JavaScript Will Become The Dominant Programming Language Of The Ente
- Code Conventions for the JavaScript Programming Language
- Douglas Crockford: The JavaScript Programming Language
- Code Conventions for the JavaScript Programming Language
- 高手提领 之 Douglas Crockford: The JavaScript Programming Language
- Code Conventions for the JavaScript Programming Language (From WAN)
- The C# Programming Language Notes
- The C++ Programming Language 第五章
- The C++ Programming Language 第四章
- The C++ Programming Language 第六章 笔记
- The C++ Programming Language 第五章 作业
- Bjarne Stroustrup(BS)博士在 The C++ Programming Language(Special Edition)中对读者的忠告2(摘抄)
- The Curl Programming Language
- The C++ Programming Language 第二章