Linux进程调度
2016-04-16 10:02
381 查看
进程的调度时机与进程的切换
操作系统原理中介绍了大量进程调度算法,这些算法从实现的角度看仅仅是从运行队列中选择一个新进程,选择的过程中运用了不同的策略而已。
对于理解操作系统的工作机制,反而是进程的调度时机与进程的切换机制更为关键。
进程调度的时机
中断处理过程(包括时钟中断、I/O中断、系统调用和异常)中,直接调用schedule(),或者返回用户态时根据need_resched标记调用schedule();
内核线程可以直接调用schedule()进行进程切换,也可以在中断处理过程中进行调度,也就是说内核线程作为一类的特殊的进程可以主动调度,也可以被动调度;
用户态进程无法实现主动调度,仅能通过陷入内核态后的某个时机点进行调度,即在中断处理过程中进行调度。
进程的切换
为了控制进程的执行,内核必须有能力挂起正在CPU上执行的进程,并恢复以前挂起的某个进程的执行,这叫做进程切换、任务切换、上下文切换;
挂起正在CPU上执行的进程,与中断时保存现场是不同的,中断前后是在同一个进程上下文中,只是由用户态转向内核态执行;
进程上下文包含了进程执行需要的所有信息
用户地址空间: 包括程序代码,数据,用户堆栈等
控制信息 :进程描述符,内核堆栈等
硬件上下文(注意中断也要保存硬件上下文只是保存的方法不同)
schedule()函数选择一个新的进程来运行,并调用context_switch进行上下文的切换,这个宏调用switch_to来进行关键上下文切换
next = pick_next_task(rq, prev);//进程调度算法都封装这个函数内部
context_switch(rq, prev, next);//进程上下文切换
switch_to利用了prev和next两个参数:prev指向当前进程,next指向被调度的进程
schedule()函数源码如下:
swith_to宏的代码如下,这是一段汇编代码,源码中已经注释的很明确了,直接看注释
操作系统原理中介绍了大量进程调度算法,这些算法从实现的角度看仅仅是从运行队列中选择一个新进程,选择的过程中运用了不同的策略而已。
对于理解操作系统的工作机制,反而是进程的调度时机与进程的切换机制更为关键。
进程调度的时机
中断处理过程(包括时钟中断、I/O中断、系统调用和异常)中,直接调用schedule(),或者返回用户态时根据need_resched标记调用schedule();
内核线程可以直接调用schedule()进行进程切换,也可以在中断处理过程中进行调度,也就是说内核线程作为一类的特殊的进程可以主动调度,也可以被动调度;
用户态进程无法实现主动调度,仅能通过陷入内核态后的某个时机点进行调度,即在中断处理过程中进行调度。
进程的切换
为了控制进程的执行,内核必须有能力挂起正在CPU上执行的进程,并恢复以前挂起的某个进程的执行,这叫做进程切换、任务切换、上下文切换;
挂起正在CPU上执行的进程,与中断时保存现场是不同的,中断前后是在同一个进程上下文中,只是由用户态转向内核态执行;
进程上下文包含了进程执行需要的所有信息
用户地址空间: 包括程序代码,数据,用户堆栈等
控制信息 :进程描述符,内核堆栈等
硬件上下文(注意中断也要保存硬件上下文只是保存的方法不同)
schedule()函数选择一个新的进程来运行,并调用context_switch进行上下文的切换,这个宏调用switch_to来进行关键上下文切换
next = pick_next_task(rq, prev);//进程调度算法都封装这个函数内部
context_switch(rq, prev, next);//进程上下文切换
switch_to利用了prev和next两个参数:prev指向当前进程,next指向被调度的进程
schedule()函数源码如下:
/* * __schedule() is the main scheduler function. * * The main means of driving the scheduler and thus entering this function are: * * 1. Explicit blocking: mutex, semaphore, waitqueue, etc. * * 2. TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag is checked on interrupt and userspace return * paths. For example, see arch/x86/entry_64.S. * * To drive preemption between tasks, the scheduler sets the flag in timer * interrupt handler scheduler_tick(). * * 3. Wakeups don't really cause entry into schedule(). They add a * task to the run-queue and that's it. * * Now, if the new task added to the run-queue preempts the current * task, then the wakeup sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED and schedule() gets * called on the nearest possible occasion: * * - If the kernel is preemptible (CONFIG_PREEMPT=y): * * - in syscall or exception context, at the next outmost * preempt_enable(). (this might be as soon as the wake_up()'s * spin_unlock()!) * * - in IRQ context, return from interrupt-handler to * preemptible context * * - If the kernel is not preemptible (CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set) * then at the next: * * - cond_resched() call * - explicit schedule() call * - return from syscall or exception to user-space * - return from interrupt-handler to user-space */ static void __sched __schedule(void) { struct task_struct *prev, *next; unsigned long *switch_count; struct rq *rq; int cpu; need_resched: preempt_disable(); cpu = smp_processor_id(); rq = cpu_rq(cpu); rcu_note_context_switch(cpu); prev = rq->curr; schedule_debug(prev); if (sched_feat(HRTICK)) hrtick_clear(rq); /* * Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below * can't be reordered with __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) * done by the caller to avoid the race with signal_wake_up(). */ smp_mb__before_spinlock(); raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock); switch_count = &prev->nivcsw; if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) { if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev))) { prev->state = TASK_RUNNING; } else { deactivate_task(rq, prev, DEQUEUE_SLEEP); prev->on_rq = 0; /* * If a worker went to sleep, notify and ask workqueue * whether it wants to wake up a task to maintain * concurrency. */ if (prev->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER) { struct task_struct *to_wakeup; to_wakeup = wq_worker_sleeping(prev, cpu); if (to_wakeup) try_to_wake_up_local(to_wakeup); } } switch_count = &prev->nvcsw; } if (task_on_rq_queued(prev) || rq->skip_clock_update < 0) update_rq_clock(rq); next = pick_next_task(rq, prev);//从等待队列中挑选出下一个等待调度的进程 clear_tsk_need_resched(prev); clear_preempt_need_resched(); rq->skip_clock_update = 0; if (likely(prev != next)) { rq->nr_switches++; rq->curr = next; ++*switch_count; context_switch(rq, prev, next); /* unlocks the rq ,进行进程上下文的切换*/ /* * The context switch have flipped the stack from under us * and restored the local variables which were saved when * this task called schedule() in the past. prev == current * is still correct, but it can be moved to another cpu/rq. */ cpu = smp_processor_id(); rq = cpu_rq(cpu); } else raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); post_schedule(rq); sched_preempt_enable_no_resched(); if (need_resched()) goto need_resched; }context_switch代码如下:
/* * context_switch - switch to the new MM and the new * thread's register state. */ static inline void context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next) { struct mm_struct *mm, *oldmm; prepare_task_switch(rq, prev, next); mm = next->mm;//mm指向了next进程的内存空间 oldmm = prev->active_mm; /* * For paravirt, this is coupled with an exit in switch_to to * combine the page table reload and the switch backend into * one hypercall. */ arch_start_context_switch(prev); if (!mm) { next->active_mm = oldmm; atomic_inc(&oldmm->mm_count); enter_lazy_tlb(oldmm, next); } else switch_mm(oldmm, mm, next);//进程内存空间切换 if (!prev->mm) { prev->active_mm = NULL; rq->prev_mm = oldmm; } /* * Since the runqueue lock will be released by the next * task (which is an invalid locking op but in the case * of the scheduler it's an obvious special-case), so we * do an early lockdep release here: */ spin_release(&rq->lock.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); context_tracking_task_switch(prev, next); /* Here we just switch the register state and the stack. */ switch_to(prev, next, prev);//进程切换的宏,切换寄存器、栈空间 barrier(); /* * this_rq must be evaluated again because prev may have moved * CPUs since it called schedule(), thus the 'rq' on its stack * frame will be invalid. */ finish_task_switch(this_rq(), prev); }
swith_to宏的代码如下,这是一段汇编代码,源码中已经注释的很明确了,直接看注释
#define switch_to(prev, next, last) \ do { \ /* \ * Context-switching clobbers all registers, so we clobber \ * them explicitly, via unused output variables. \ * (EAX and EBP is not listed because EBP is saved/restored \ * explicitly for wchan access and EAX is the return value of \ * __switch_to()) \ */ \ unsigned long ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi; \ \ asm volatile("pushfl\n\t" /* save flags */ \ "pushl %%ebp\n\t" /* save EBP */ \ "movl %%esp,%[prev_sp]\n\t" /* save ESP */ \ "movl %[next_sp],%%esp\n\t" /* restore ESP */ \ "movl $1f,%[prev_ip]\n\t" /* save EIP */ \ "pushl %[next_ip]\n\t" /* restore EIP */ \ __switch_canary \ "jmp __switch_to\n" /* regparm call */ \ "1:\t" \ "popl %%ebp\n\t" /* restore EBP */ \ "popfl\n" /* restore flags */ \ \ /* output parameters */ \ : [prev_sp] "=m" (prev->thread.sp), \ [prev_ip] "=m" (prev->thread.ip), \ "=a" (last), \ \ /* clobbered output registers: */ \ "=b" (ebx), "=c" (ecx), "=d" (edx), \ "=S" (esi), "=D" (edi) \ \ __switch_canary_oparam \ \ /* input parameters: */ \ : [next_sp] "m" (next->thread.sp), \ [next_ip] "m" (next->thread.ip), \ \ /* regparm parameters for __switch_to(): */ \ [prev] "a" (prev), \ [next] "d" (next) \ \ __switch_canary_iparam \ \ : /* reloaded segment registers */ \ "memory"); \ } while (0)
相关文章推荐
- Linux快捷登录二 sshpass命令
- ti processor sdk linux am335x evm /bin/commom.sh hacking
- Linux中exec命令相关
- Linux学习之CentOS(一)--CentOS7环境搭建
- 再来说说Linux文件权限那些事儿
- Linux fork和getpid语句详解
- Centos6.5 mysql安装
- Centos6.5 mysql安装
- linux内核数据包转发流程(二):中断
- linux杂谈
- centos6.5下python2.6.6版本升级Python2.7.6安装过程
- 回顾微软近年来对于Linux和开源的策略
- linux安装maven
- CentOS升级Python2.6到Python2.7并安装pip
- Linux安装SmartSVN及破解
- Linux应用层系统时间写入RTC时钟的方法
- linux下Mysq表名的大小写问题解析
- centos7 安装lnmp
- linux如何安装MyEclipse 2014
- Linux下mysql使用记录