您的位置:首页 > 数据库 > Oracle

Library cachelatches gone in Oracle 11g

2016-03-22 00:09 651 查看
Library cachelatches gone in Oracle 11g
by TANEL PODER posted
on AUGUST 3,2008
In Oracle 11g even more library cache operations have been changed to useKGX mutexes instead of latches.
In Oracle 10.2.0.2+ the library cachepin latch
usage wasreplaced with mutexes whenever _kks_use_mutex_pinwas true, alsofew other things like V$SQLSTATS arrays and parent cursor examination
wereprotected by mutexes. However the traversing of library cache hash chains (theright child cursor lookup using kksfbc()) was still protected by library cachelatches which could become a problem with frequent soft parsing combined withtoo little cursor cache
and long library cache hash chains (remember, thelibrary cache latches were always taken exclusively even for plain hash chainscanning).
In 11g all library cache related latches except “library cache load lock”are gone and corresponding operations are protected by mutexes instead. The“library cache” latches have been replaced
by “Library Cache” mutexes forexample.
Here are couple queries which illustrate the change.
Executed on 10.2.0.3:
SQL> select name from
v$latch where lower(name) like'%library%';
 
NAME
--------------------------------------------------
library cache pin allocation
library cache lock allocation
library cache hash chains
library cache lock
library cache
library cache pin
library cache load lock
 
7 rows selected.
 
SQL> select name from
v$event_name where name like '%library%';
 
NAME
----------------------------------------------------------------
latch: library cache
latch: library cache lock
latch: library cache pin
library cache pin
library cache lock
library cache load lock
library cache revalidation
library cache shutdown
 
8 rows selected.
 
Same queries executed on11.1.0.6 and
the boldlines above are gone:
SQL> select name from v$latch where lower(name) like '%library%';
 
NAME
----------------------------------------------------------------
library cache load lock
 
SQL> select name from v$event_name where name like '%library%';
 
NAME
----------------------------------------------------------------
library cache pin
library cache lock
library cache load lock
library cache: mutex X
library cache: mutex S
OSD IPC library
library cache revalidation
library cache shutdown
 
8 rows selected.
 
Looks like the developers have thrown out library cache latching mechanism
in 11gas the mutexes introduced in 10.2 have proven to work fine (and they havemanaged to implement mutexes for protecting (almost) the full set of librarycache operations).

So there is no way to revert back to old behaviour using_kks_use_mutex_pin=false (and you wouldn’t need to do this anyway, btw). Theparameter is still there though and out of interest I checked what happens if Iset it to false and bounced the instance.
As, expected, I started getting error messages like following right afterstartup:
ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
 
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kglGetSessionUOL], [7], [],[], [], [], [], []
 
This is a good example of dangers with undocumented parameters – they maywork ok in one version (and platform) but could cause serious trouble anywhereelse.
Anyway, back to mutexes. In 10g you see there are 3 types of mutexes used:
SQL> select * from v$mutex_sleep;
 
MUTEX_TYPE                      LOCATION                                    SLEEPS  WAIT_TIME
-------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ----------
Cursor Stat                      kksFindCursorStat[KKSSTALOC3]                  339        775
Cursor Parent                    kkspsc0[KKSPRTLOC26]                         1507     123969
Cursor Parent                   kksLoadChild [KKSPRTLOC5]                       170        372
Cursor Parent                   kksLoadChild [KKSPRTLOC4]                       385       3799
Cursor Parent                   kksfbc [KKSPRTLOC2]                            1649      22484
Cursor Parent                   kksfbc [KKSPRTLOC1]                             128      1599
Cursor Pin                       kksLockDelete[KKSCHLPIN6]                    3505     928387
Cursor Pin                      kkslce [KKSCHLPIN2]                           15343  160394917
Cursor Pin                       kksfbc[KKSCHLFSP2]                           3219    9065433
 
9 rows selected.
 
In 11g there are couple additional mutexes, one (and most important) ofthem is Library Cache mutex:
SQL> select distinct mutex_type from v$mutex_sleep_history;
 
MUTEX_TYPE
--------------------------------
Library Cache
Cursor Pin
Cursor Parent
Cursor Stat
 
(I had to sample v$mutex_sleep_history instead of v$mutex_sleep on 11g asthe latter was empty on 11g… it may be that the mutex get operations have beentuned further to not maintain the
counters just to save even few more CPUcycles every get)
So, starting from 11g, each library cache bucket is protected by aseparate mutex (yes all 131072 of them!).
Previously we had all those buckets were hashed to and protected by max 67library cache latches which inevitably were prone to unnecessary falsecontention in case of many cursors being
executed concurrently. Now this issueshould be resolved once and for all. Of course the library cache mutexes stilldon’t solve all problems in the world (especially the ones related to excessivehard parsing!), for example there’s still a chance of hash collision
of twoentirely different cursors. Also, if there are many child cursors under aparent and the application cursor management is poor (e.g. cursors are closedafter every execution and no session cursor caching is done) then you couldstill have contention on
the mutex due continuous library cache hash chaintraversing.
NB! If you want to move to the "New World" - and benefit fromthe awesomeness of Hadoop, without having to re-engineer your
existingapplications - check out Gluent, my new startup that will make history!;-)
related posts
内容来自用户分享和网络整理,不保证内容的准确性,如有侵权内容,可联系管理员处理 点击这里给我发消息
标签: