【Oracle】-【ROWNUM与索引】-索引对ROWNUM检索的影响

看到ASK TOM的一篇文章，挺有感触的。

http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:32812348052

主要问的是ROWNUM的问题。后面的一个讨论提问谈到：

select ename, sal

from emp

where rownum<=10

order by sal desc;

和

select ename, sal

from ( select ename, sal

from emp

order by sal desc)

where rownum<=10;

是否相同？

第一个SQL是先找到ROWNUM<10的记录，然后排序。

第二个SQL是先ORDER BY排序，再找ROWNUM<10的记录。

因此两种查询得到的答案不同，当然有时也会碰巧相同。

另外，如果表有索引，那么对于第二个SQL，可以从后面的记录开始读，避免排序。对于这个问题我做了实验：

create table t as select * from dba_objects;

create table t2 as select * from dba_objects;

create index t2_i on t2(object_id);

SQL> select * from (select owner, object_name, object_id from t order by object_id desc) where rownum<10;

9 rows selected.

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3299198703

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation               | Name | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT        |      |     9 |   864 |       |  1189   (1)| 00:00:15 |

|*  1 |  COUNT STOPKEY          |      |       |       |       |            |       |

|   2 |   VIEW                  |      | 47308 |  4435K|       |  1189   (1)| 00:00:15 |
|*  3 |    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY|      | 47308 |  4435K|     9M|  1189   (1)| 00:00:15 |

|   4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL   | T    | 47308 |  4435K|       |   150   (1)| 00:00:02 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter(ROWNUM<10)

   3 - filter(ROWNUM<10)

Note

-----

   - dynamic sampling used for this statement

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

          7  recursive calls

          0  db block gets

        793  consistent gets

          0  physical reads

          0  redo size

        878  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        492  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          1  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          9  rows processed

SQL> select * from ( select owner, object_name, object_id from t2 order by object_id desc) where rownum < 10;

9 rows selected.

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 98068844

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation               | Name | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT        |      |     9 |   864 |       |  1164   (1)| 00:00:14 |

|*  1 |  COUNT STOPKEY          |      |       |       |       |            |       |

|   2 |   VIEW                  |      | 46110 |  4322K|       |  1164   (1)| 00

:00:14 |

|*  3 |    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY|      | 46110 |  4322K|  9848K|  1164   (1)| 00:00:14 |

|   4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL   | T2   | 46110 |  4322K|       |   150   (1)| 00:00:02 |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------
   1 - filter(ROWNUM<10)

   3 - filter(ROWNUM<10)

Note

-----

   - dynamic sampling used for this statement

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

          7  recursive calls

          0  db block gets

        791  consistent gets

          0  physical reads

          0  redo size

        878  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        492  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          1  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          9  rows processed

第二个SQL仅比第一个SQL少2个consistent gets，不像讨论中说的会明显的变化。这个讨论是2001年的，不知道是不是版本的问题？我用的是10g。

还请高手指点！