WCF vs .NET Remoting 2.0
2008-04-25 22:05
260 查看
WCF:
WCF is Microsoft recommended direction
WCF was released on January 2006 with Go-Live Licenses, but it will be officially released on November of this year
WCF is a 100% Service Oriented Architecture application development platform
WCF Security Architecture is interoperable, based on WS-* specifications and it’s designed for On-Machine, Cross-Machine, and Cross-Internet scenarios.
WCF Transaction Architecture is full flexible, declarative and has method level granularity
WCF binary messages are smaller and faster than Remoting’s.
Services versioning is better dealt with WCF than with Remoting.
.Net Remoting for .Net Framework 2.0:
Remoting is not recommended by Microsoft
Remoting for .Net Framework 2.0 was released in December 2005
Remoting is tightly coupled Object Oriented technology and not loosely coupled Service Oriented.
It has security limitations, though now it has the new secure TcpChannel
With System.Transactions we can get similar transaction management capabilities but not in a declarative way
Thanks!
Daniel.
WCF is Microsoft recommended direction
WCF was released on January 2006 with Go-Live Licenses, but it will be officially released on November of this year
WCF is a 100% Service Oriented Architecture application development platform
WCF Security Architecture is interoperable, based on WS-* specifications and it’s designed for On-Machine, Cross-Machine, and Cross-Internet scenarios.
WCF Transaction Architecture is full flexible, declarative and has method level granularity
WCF binary messages are smaller and faster than Remoting’s.
Services versioning is better dealt with WCF than with Remoting.
.Net Remoting for .Net Framework 2.0:
Remoting is not recommended by Microsoft
Remoting for .Net Framework 2.0 was released in December 2005
Remoting is tightly coupled Object Oriented technology and not loosely coupled Service Oriented.
It has security limitations, though now it has the new secure TcpChannel
With System.Transactions we can get similar transaction management capabilities but not in a declarative way
Thanks!
Daniel.
相关文章推荐
- Remoting VS WCF 传输效率对比
- [转]ASP.NET 1.1 VS ASP.NET 2.0
- WCF vs ASP.NET Web services
- (转)IIS7 配置ASP.NET 2.0, WCF, ASP.NET MVC
- ASP.NET 1.1 VS ASP.NET 2.0
- 在VS 2005和ASP.NET 2.0中处理CSS样式表
- 用VSCode开发一个asp.net core 2.0+angular 5项目(4): Angular5全局错误处理
- .Net Remoting与WCF实现Server与Client通讯比较
- ASP.NET MVC 1.0 转化为ASP.NET MVC 2.0的方法 vs 2010
- How to build Multi-Language Web Sites with ASP.NET 2.0 and VS.Net 2005
- .net Remoting、WebService和WCF的区别联系:
- IIS7 配置ASP.NET 2.0, WCF, ASP.NET MVC
- .NET 2.0 VS .NET 1.0
- 当Starteam For VS.NET 2003遇上.NET Framework 2.0
- WCF VS ASPNET WEB SERVICE
- vs.net发送邮件(2.0)
- IIS7 配置ASP.NET 2.0, WCF, ASP.NET MVC
- .net Remoting、WebService和WCF的区别联系:
- NET2.0 Remoting 开发
- 在VS.net 2005(ASP.NET 2.0) 中为GridView加行序的方法