The first time--write a test spec.
2007-03-01 13:54
519 查看
Today I'm try to write a test spec for a bug.Although,that is not all my effort,as I use a exited spec to cover it actually.Only need I do is modify some points,and copy some steps to finish it.But only for this,I think there also have something worth attention.
For example,as there are several steps are duplicate,we can test that point from the middle of that spec.The question is coming.Finishing test for one point,the page is stay at some places.But for another point,we need return to previous page and choose the radio box.In that way,we can test that function.But I already forget for this point.I just write choose which radio box,and posterior steps.I think that'll lead to some tester who don't konw of this module puzzle.However,lots pepole discuss this point that if the spec should let everyone konw how to test,even a freshman.That question is wrting spec clearly as one's best.Some pepole said that is impossible,as that'll impact the reusing of spec.Other people said this situation--let freshman test system--is realistic.So,it become a disharmonious question.Maybe we have no idea to settle it.But I hold that we ought to write clearly at least.From another aspect,I think that I didn't think the question clearly.I should pay more attention for this point.Actually,in work and life,lots questions are reckless,those can be avoided totally.So why don't we do that!
That is my first time to write a spec,although it's not spec in deed.But,that's a good starting.I hold that I'll write more specs in the future,and must gain more good experience for myself.I'll carry on for this way.Maybe this is my new year wish.hehe!
For example,as there are several steps are duplicate,we can test that point from the middle of that spec.The question is coming.Finishing test for one point,the page is stay at some places.But for another point,we need return to previous page and choose the radio box.In that way,we can test that function.But I already forget for this point.I just write choose which radio box,and posterior steps.I think that'll lead to some tester who don't konw of this module puzzle.However,lots pepole discuss this point that if the spec should let everyone konw how to test,even a freshman.That question is wrting spec clearly as one's best.Some pepole said that is impossible,as that'll impact the reusing of spec.Other people said this situation--let freshman test system--is realistic.So,it become a disharmonious question.Maybe we have no idea to settle it.But I hold that we ought to write clearly at least.From another aspect,I think that I didn't think the question clearly.I should pay more attention for this point.Actually,in work and life,lots questions are reckless,those can be avoided totally.So why don't we do that!
That is my first time to write a spec,although it's not spec in deed.But,that's a good starting.I hold that I'll write more specs in the future,and must gain more good experience for myself.I'll carry on for this way.Maybe this is my new year wish.hehe!
相关文章推荐
- The first time to write an article
- The first time:数据结构作业——自定义链表及其操作
- the first title so that nothing for test
- A Test (at first automatically generated by the WL Writer, now intended by the blog owner)
- The first time !
- The first time to exercise the convolution
- ubuntu taste for the first time
- lua 初接触 --- The first time use Lua for programing
- The first meet with test case
- THE FIRST TIME coming in!
- PHP Warning: strftime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone testlink
- The First Test
- The Test about windows live write
- Our 6 Must Reads for First-Time Managers to Hit the Ground Running
- Android adjustpan not working after the first time
- The first time, I feel unpressed
- Results the mutual for the first time(alpha阶段总结)
- the first article as a test
- The first time
- the first time I come